Got this from Chaz: > I think it's probably best if the new repo/artifact goes under its own group with new coordinates
That's great! Thanks @slipset
I haven't studied the pom.xml file in detail, but it might be worth rewriting it to either deps.edn or project.clj?
Which leads to the question wether we should bother trying to standardize on one build-tool chain?
I'm favourable to that as it makes it easier to do maintenance across multiple projects (which is why I tend to change from whatever to circle-ci).
One benefit of using Maven (or rather a checked in pom.xml) is that the lib is consumable by deps.edn as a git depenency, right?
deps.edn and/or pom.xml makes sense. project.clj does not.
Agreed.
And I believe you have a certain grasp on deps.edn stuff, so you might be able to help out there 🙂
the pom seems extremely simple.
Given a deps.edn file, clojure -Spom produces a pom.xml file that needs only minimal changes.
(group, artifact, version, generally)
I've added a barebones deps.edn file.