Clojurians Log v2

1. If Clerk was written in Common Lisp, would objects provide their own Clerk viewer? 2. Is the idea of keeping viewers and objects with selected viewer as a map (attached code) to provide a way for objects to provide their own Clerk viewer (attached screenshot)? 3. Are you trying to hint towards that developers should a. Prefer immutable data (“just use maps” / “it’s just data”) b. Put their own data into the map under their own keys c. (optionally) also provide Clerk helpers i. by giving a :nextjournal/value and a :nextjournal/viewer key ii. optionally using structural sharing to avoid duplicate in-memory use for a duplicated :nextjournal/value value that also might occur somewhere else in the map d. and (optionally) also register a default viewer for their own types with clerk/add-viewer! e. ?

(v/with-viewer v/string-viewer "hello")
;; => #:nextjournal{:value "hello",
;;                  :viewer
;;                  {:name nextjournal.clerk.viewer/string-viewer,
;;                   :pred #function[clojure.core/string?--5475],
;;                   :render-fn nextjournal.clerk.render/render-quoted-string,
;;                   :opening-paren "\"",
;;                   :closing-paren "\"",
;;                   :page-size 80}}

On a different note, I hope everyone enjoys a lovely ☀️ Sunday ☀️!