This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2021-07-28
Channels
- # announcements (12)
- # babashka (87)
- # beginners (84)
- # calva (22)
- # circleci (4)
- # clj-kondo (46)
- # cljdoc (6)
- # cljsrn (15)
- # clojure (87)
- # clojure-europe (18)
- # clojure-uk (7)
- # clojurescript (20)
- # community-development (3)
- # conjure (1)
- # cursive (13)
- # datomic (14)
- # events (7)
- # fulcro (27)
- # graphql (31)
- # helix (8)
- # jobs-discuss (1)
- # lsp (43)
- # malli (11)
- # meander (64)
- # off-topic (7)
- # pathom (26)
- # polylith (9)
- # practicalli (2)
- # re-frame (33)
- # reagent (2)
- # reitit (5)
- # releases (2)
- # rewrite-clj (2)
- # shadow-cljs (69)
- # specter (5)
- # sql (1)
- # tools-deps (85)
- # tree-sitter (1)
- # vim (3)
I wonder if someone from CircleCI could respond to this one (maybe @marc-omorain?). As you know, Cljdoc makes use of CircleCI when analyzing library APIs (much ♥️ CircleCI!). We https://github.com/cljdoc/cljdoc/blob/c12eaae2f40447bc1009af55fbe41566f6d152f3/src/cljdoc/analysis/service.clj#L56, but I stumbled upon https://circleci.com/blog/a-deprecation-notice-on-job-triggering-with-api-v1-1/. Would you like Cljdoc to switch to the https://circleci.com/docs/api/v2/? CircleCI has been very generous to embrace Cljdoc’s usage of CircleCI, we’d hate to be annoying you by continued use of a truly deprecated API.
We love cljdoc and are more than happy to help out. The v1 API won’t be going away any time soon. I wouldn’t bother upgrading unless you have a real need.
And if you ever want help with the API please @ us here in the channel. Having some of our junior engineers help out with y’all would be great on-boarding material for us.
Thanks @marc-omorain! I am happy to upgrade to v2 if it makes life easier for CircleCI.
But... if there is no need, I am also happy to not upgrade to v2.