This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2018-10-17
Channels
- # 100-days-of-code (5)
- # announcements (13)
- # beginners (98)
- # boot (19)
- # cider (10)
- # cljdoc (32)
- # clojure (142)
- # clojure-dev (37)
- # clojure-italy (3)
- # clojure-nl (2)
- # clojure-spec (30)
- # clojure-uk (18)
- # clojurescript (28)
- # cursive (8)
- # datomic (25)
- # duct (18)
- # editors (5)
- # emacs (39)
- # events (4)
- # figwheel (7)
- # figwheel-main (5)
- # fulcro (38)
- # graphql (19)
- # jobs-discuss (1)
- # jobs-rus (7)
- # keechma (1)
- # lumo (47)
- # off-topic (28)
- # om-next (3)
- # parinfer (3)
- # re-frame (18)
- # reagent (37)
- # reitit (8)
- # shadow-cljs (101)
- # specter (7)
- # tools-deps (8)
- # vim (1)
You mean I should not be on melpa-stable? Hmm. I always thought this is the way to go if you care mostly about getting things done…
i think emacs usually picks the latest version of cider possible -- i pin cider to melpa-stable by doing this:
(use-package cider
:pin melpa-stable
....)
this has improved the stability of cider for me a lotmaybe i'm using cider differently from everyone else, though, but the past months i feel like cider has been moving forward a lot, and other packages are not necessarily keeping up with that speed
We’ve had a massive push in the past 3-4 months and the master
wasn’t always stable.
As the manual says - “unless you’re the adventurous type it’s best to stick to melpa-stable”. 🙂
I'm not sure what I was doing wrong but I just now had problems with melpa-stable and sesman, all good on master
though!
@edwardk There were many improvements that happened for sesman
on master
. I hope we’ll cut a new stable release which includes them relatively soon.
I'm doing a cider-connect
to a clojure -Acider-clj
Loading a buffer with C-c C-k gives me this:
Exception in thread "nREPL-worker-0" java.lang.ClassCastException: nrepl.middleware.pr_values$pr_values$fn$reify__11007 cannot be cast to clojure.tools.nrepl.transport.Transport
Can anyone help me get to the bottom of this? (this is 0.18)