Doesn't look like it does.

OK, I'm confused again... I was playing with the various grimoire commands, and managed to open up in the browser the page for ->

That page was fully styled. But now, no matter what command I try, I get something (in the browser) that looks like just preformatted plain text.

How did I get the original styled HTML page?

installed emacs on a new machine and I got cider-add-to-alist: Invalid function: (cons (assoc car alist))

perils of living on the bleeding edge I think, I am running melpa (unstable) and nrepl latest snapshot

did you get that on cider-jack-in or in startup?

jack in

tools.nrepl "0.2.12" cider-nrepl "0.15.0-SNAPSHOT" and fresh cider from melpa

which version of emacs are you running?

one of the latest commits is dropping support for 24.3 apparently

24.4.1

ahhh

well, should work

should

haha

lots of adding subr-x.el

yeah the error make it sound like an emacs dependency issue more than a cider problem per say

I think I have emacs25 on the same machine, I ll try

same error

25.1.50

bummer

ok

i just updated my local git repo to head and i'm opening up a repl

damn. it worked (R) for me

nuking .emacs.d/elpa and retesting

apparently google says I am not the only one with that issue: http://emacs.stackexchange.com/questions/28816/why-do-the-latest-versions-of-use-package-and-cider-break-each-other

this seems to be the offending code here but its been around since March

same issue with clean elpa

ah, can you try something for me?

navigate to cider-util.el in your .emacs.d/elpa structure

the cider code itself

or even better

C-h F [ret] if-let

yes

see if if-let is defined in your emacs

it's there

hmm

I can eval (require 'subr-x)

back to the drawing board

i ll check if-let

ah! i remember some bugs where people introduced their own version of if-let before it was baked into emacs

suspicion, a package you are using still has their own implementation that is inferior for general use but only what they need in their own use case

i ll grep my elpa

so, to test this theory, C-h C-f [ret] if-let will navigate to somewhere besides subr-el

as if-let is defined in another package

I have refs to --if-let and -if-let but no if-let other than in cider stuff

did navigating to the source of if-let take you to subr in emacs?

I didn't try that

it might be the issue, but that's odd

the config is here if curious: https://github.com/mpenet/emax

going to reinstall emacs from scratch, I have a mess of versions on this machine

and it works on a fresh emacs25.x

at last

that's a bummer you had to go through all of that

happy coding!

thx!

just fyi @dpsutton @mpenet cider’s own build (master HEAD) fails with the same error

hmm weird

i pulled it this morning and then jacked in

maybe i need to blow away the .ecl files

thanks for the heads up @benedek

i don't fully understand what the error is tho tbh

is if-let just not there on 24.5?

bit baffled here… 😕

benedek, is it failing for you?

i updated to master/head and it was fine

but i'm building emacs from source

and tracking master

make test fails when i try to build cider locally

after (!!) i cleaned and reinstalled deps with cask

which tests fail?

eg remove .cask/ dir and run $ cask

In end of data:
cider-apropos.el:203:1:Warning: the following functions are not known to be
    defined: if-let, results
Wrote /Users/benedek.fazekas/projects/cider/cider-apropos.elc
cask exec buttercup -L .
Warning: Lisp directory `/usr/local/Cellar/emacs/24.5/share/emacs/24.5/lisp/emacs-parallel': No such file or directory
Warning: Lisp directory `/usr/local/Cellar/emacs/24.5/share/emacs/24.5/lisp/emacs-parallel': No such file or directory
Invalid function: (cons (assoc car alist))
make: *** [test] Error 255

i think this is compilation phase

well that explains that

in emacs, can you try C-h C-f [ret] if-let

you mean C-h f?

C-h C-f gives me emacs faq

you can do a M-x describe-function

then if-let, should tell you : if-let is a Lisp macro in ‘subr-x.el’. [...]

well, there is no such thing as if-let according to my emacs. :wtf:

well damn

i'm running tests right now. all mine pass

looks like the use of if-let is premature

what is your emacs version @dpsutton ?

i mean if-let is used all over cider all the time...

probably there are some emacs builds around with wrong subrx version?!

no idea what happened on my end tbh. I had 3 versions of emacs installed, I suspect a mess of mixed emacs dependencies

just nuked the whole thing and installed the latest snapshot

I should have done that a long time ago anyway

GNU Emacs 26.0.50.2 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.20.9) of 2016-11-20

ha that is real bleeding edge! 😄

GNU Emacs 26.0.50.2 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.10.8) of 2016-10-26

dpsutton do you have flickers sometimes on magit status?

i'm tracking master though so i'm not sure if the version reflects where I actually am

flickers?

don't think so

or not that i've noticed

ok

actually it only does it the first time I magit c-g on a repo

well it's barely noticeable

so if-let is used quite a bit throughout cider

and recently cider-compat.el was removed

yup

it looks like the assumption that emacs.24.4 did not need this was incorrect

strangely my cider works fine

i mean i can jack in etc

haha wut

oh i thought you said you couldn't

i'll bet you have a package that defines its own version of if-let

i am also on latest master (`20161121.312`)

can you navigate to the source of it?

surely but afaik dash.el does that but it is namespaced as -if-let and —if-let

but i will dblcheck

also, can you check if you have a cider-compat.elc in your cider directory?

or possibly just .el

nope

what does M-x describe-function [ret] if-let return?

i can’t. no-match

i can't imagine how cider works for you then haha

can you navigate to cider-util.el?

same here...

or specifically you can go to the source of cider-add-to-alist

actually i'm just totally stumped

there are tons of if-lets in the source

i have string-trim tho which is defined in subr-x too

there are

so i have a version of subr-x perhaps not the right version?! or something weird

so my local subr-x in 24.5/lisp/emacs-lisp deffo does not have if-let. only a bunch of string related and hashtable related functions

weird. those went into emacs on june 29, 2014

?!

you mean if-let?

yeah

yup looking at the same thing

i use this osx build tbh

https://github.com/railwaycat/homebrew-emacsmacport

wonder if that is the culprit?! on the other hand the cider travis build (failing the same way) uses an ubuntu image

where are you seeing the cider travis build failure?

https://api.travis-ci.org/jobs/177236922/log.txt?deansi=true

this is the raw log from the latest master build: https://travis-ci.org/clojure-emacs/cider/builds

there it is

yup

if-let doesn't exist, so it doesn't know that's a let binding

i know

and so (cons ...) looks bad

it is just WEIRD

super weird

what's your emacs version benedek?

24.5.1

GNU Emacs 24.5.1 (x86_64-apple-darwin14.4.0, Carbon Version 157 AppKit 1348.17) of 2016-01-04

so i know there was a long running branch for emacs 25. I wonder if even though subr was updated a long time ago it was never added to 24.x

i think as it stands CIDER is only compatible with emacs 25+

current workaround is to run CIDER from elpa-stable rather than elpa

those if-lets were added to cider in like march tho

not really working for me as i have build failures in clj-refactor because of this 😉

but cider-compat.el was just removed

guess what was included in that i bet

hm...

that file was removed thinking it dropped support for 24.3. but it actually dropped support for 24.x

is my suspicion

ofc

you are right

perhaps some elc of this (cider-compat) is still lurking around somewhere in my emacs that is why it kinda works...

@theeternalpulse

not private @theeternalpulse

or i am just “lucky” enough not to hit those parts of cider using if-let

not a chance

it uses a if-let in getting the dependencies for jacking in

thanks. I just wanted to keep up with the cider issues, saw it referenced on gitter

i think you still have a .elc file in the directory

since elisp is such a lookup this name when you need it, you happen to have it

yeah right. i've actually written that bit 😄

haha don't delete that .elc

that's why it shows in the test logs

those machines are provisioned in vagrant so they can have no remnants from previous builds

i reinstalled cider yesterday (and i do delete previous version before installing new) so i don’t have an elc strangely

anyway surely i have it somewhere 😄

When booting up a sibling ClojureScript REPL, sometimes a session returns every evaluated form as a string ex: cljs.user> (+ 1 1) => “2” whereas other times it properly returns it as cljs.user> (+ 1 1) => 2. I’ve tried to isolate the problem, but just when I think I have it cornered it evaluates correctly (or incorrectly) the next time I jack in. Has anyone else had this problem? Any hints?

OK, I'm confused again... I was playing with the various grimoire commands, and managed to open up in the browser the page for -> [10:43] That page was fully styled. But now, no matter what command I try, I get something (in the browser) that looks like just preformatted plain text. [10:44] How did I get the original styled HTML page?