yep

is it too naive to wish for grimoire, http://clojuredocs.org and http://clojure.org all becoming one authoritative ref site?

guess so

now that http://clojure.org is finally accepting contributions that might happen some day

but I’m relatively certain it will slow move at a relatively slow pace

compared to other projects

it might be nice to see grimoire and clojuredocs join forces, though

not sure what the story is there

clojuredocs wasn’t updated in a while and got an update around the time grimoire was released

guess competition is always good for business

indeed it is. i actually helped out with grimoire. it’s much as you say; the other was old and @arrdem had a big itch

does anyone know how I can control which version of cider gets installed using package-install? I refreshed to 0.10.0 and am having problems so I’d like to go back to 0.9.1

it's determined by your package repo

ah, so you can’t pick specific versions?

is 0.9.1 in melpa-stable then?

that's what I do, there may be another way

yes, melpa-stable

@lgastako: I remember having a similar issue with magit, and if I’m not wrong I used the pinned package to force a different repo, that were using the needed version

Yeah I’m looking into that now. I’m not super familiar with all the package stuff, but I’ve recently started using use-package which I think makes it easy to do that

if you need the melpa-stable version, something like (add-to-list 'package-pinned-packages '(cider . "melpa-stable") t) should do that

I’ll give that a shot

Hmm I think I got back back to 0.9.1 but none of the keybindings like C-c C-k work. Odd.

mmm

that is weird

any error messages? while loading or while trying the keybindings

The only errors are related to magit, unless maybe this is a clue: nREPL: No response handler with id 4 found

mmm, not sure