Fork me on GitHub
#cider
<
2015-07-24
>
bozhidar05:07:23

@enn, actually a while back with added some support for cljx

bozhidar05:07:50

and when a file was the result of cross-compilation the cljx file was used instead of the compiled one

bozhidar05:07:06

not sure how well this approach works in practice, though

bozhidar05:07:23

I’ve never used cljx myself, just accepted a few patches about it

benedek06:07:31

i don't work on that project anymore but acc my memories this worked fine with cljx files

stuartsierra12:07:08

Anybody using org-babel to produce documents that mix definitions and REPL interactions? I.e. My definitions are in blocks starting #+BEGIN_SRC clojure :results silent and the REPL interactions in #+BEGIN_SRC clojure :results pp code :exports both :wrap "SRC clojure :eval no" but the exported HTML doesn't distinguish them, so I can't style them differently.

enn12:07:27

@bozhidar Thanks, that’s encouraging, I will play with it further

enn13:07:56

Damn, somehow I can’t even build .cljx files now in Cider.

malabarba13:07:29

@stuartsierra: You could try asking over at http://emacs.stackexchange.com

malabarba13:07:12

I'm sure there's a way to make them distinguishable from html (though you clearly know more about org-export then I do) simple_smile

cichli17:07:11

@robert-stuttaford: I see the bad state errors on any namespace that requires clj-uuid - in that case it’s actually a Clojure problem to do with non-qualified return type hints - http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJ-1232

mchampine19:07:11

@stuartsierra: I haven't tried styling my org-babel output, but it looks like you can do that with #+HTML_HEAD . Also more advance techniques described at http://emacs.stackexchange.com/questions/3374/set-the-background-of-org-exported-code-blocks-according-to-theme

fhanreich22:07:19

Could someone tell me where I can find archived messages of Slack channels?

jcsims22:07:26

fhanreich: there’s no official archive, but I know someone is archiving this particular slack. Can’t seem to find the link at the moment, though...

fhanreich22:07:44

@jcsims: Thank you. Maybe I should ask @robert-stuttaford. I vaguely remember him mentioning about the bots...

jcsims22:07:12

it’s been linked several times, I just failed to bookmark it =/

fhanreich22:07:55

@jcsims: Same here 😞

fhanreich22:07:04

@bhagany: Thank you! Bookmarked 😉

bhagany22:07:07

no problem simple_smile