This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2017-01-17
Channels
- # aws (2)
- # beginners (34)
- # boot (39)
- # cider (28)
- # cljs-dev (2)
- # cljsrn (30)
- # clojure (195)
- # clojure-austin (6)
- # clojure-dev (6)
- # clojure-dusseldorf (1)
- # clojure-france (1)
- # clojure-russia (139)
- # clojure-spec (25)
- # clojure-uk (66)
- # clojurescript (125)
- # community-development (1)
- # core-async (42)
- # cryogen (1)
- # cursive (22)
- # datascript (6)
- # datomic (67)
- # docker (1)
- # emacs (7)
- # events (1)
- # garden (3)
- # hoplon (15)
- # jobs (3)
- # lein-figwheel (10)
- # leiningen (3)
- # luminus (4)
- # mount (2)
- # nginx (1)
- # off-topic (101)
- # om (42)
- # om-next (6)
- # onyx (7)
- # proton (1)
- # protorepl (4)
- # re-frame (15)
- # reagent (30)
- # remote-jobs (1)
- # ring (8)
- # ring-swagger (17)
- # rum (1)
- # spacemacs (2)
- # sql (1)
- # yada (50)
can anybody help me out?
I don't know where this error come from
it seems, but I am not sure of course some problem of versioning
@vinnyataide I would delete your .boot
folder (`C:\Users\Vinicius\.boot`) and try the command again. That should clear out any “bad” version of Boot and download the latest stable version again.
@vinnyataide You probably also want to run boot -V
(or boot —version
) to see what version of Clojure and what version of Boot your system thinks it has installed.
thanks guys. I think this problem is resolved but another error has appeared
I think this is related to dependency conflict?
@vinnyataide Hmm, that's normally just a warning in my experience... You can set the version of Clojure that Boot uses in your .boot/boot.properties
file. You don't say what command you used that produced that error, nor what's in your build.boot
file.
Working on my PR, https://github.com/boot-clj/boot/pull/549, the question came up where to put the launch-socket-server
fn. I initially chose boot.core because that's where launch-nrepl is too. But @martinklepsch mentioned that boot.core may not be ideal as it isn't accessible from code running inside pods. If I had to pick a different namespace, which one should I choose? boot.util? A new one?
@pesterhazy probably a new task with new package (by the way I can add you to powerlaces
if you like)
@richiardiandrea sorry didn't catch the context
@richiardiandrea the random assets was mostly a comparison to boot reload which has a case for reload, which I think would be well replaced by a multi method or something
oh ok, I think figwheel has some custom event handler hook in the client. not sure though. The nice thing is that the client is imported "as is"
@richiardiandrea ah, so it's just what Figwheel supports already?
I think I have seen something, I don't know if it is exactly what you are asking though
also, now we can add features to figwheel
and have it in both 😉
@geoffs Now that you are the reigning master of notifications, can I ask you a question? 😄
when you run a test and it is failing with notify -a
, do you hear a sound?
I am using boot-alt-test
this time, which one did you check against?
the success is playing right
the failure does not
I think that might be the problem
ok thanks just wanted to double check again the I have this problem and you don't 🙂
@geoffs is there a way to indicate failure other than throwing? I see why you would no want to throw and it might be good to another way to indicate failure
hmmm, you could have it set a warning. But that gets a different noise than the failure noise. At least it would be different than the success noise though
uhm yeah this can be a good solution
I guess there could also be a failures
var with an atom similar to warnings. I think the exception makes sense to me as the general "signal" a build failure mechanism...
also @richiardiandrea I think there is an option in boot-alt-test
to throw an exception on failure
yep I saw that, can be a workaround