@lukemorton: I suggest asking in #C03S1L9DN this isn’t really specific to Boot

^^ I want a boot specific solution

maybe still better for #C03S1L9DN tho

@lukemorton: then I might not understand the question: you were asking how to run cljs test from within a cljs repl right?

so I tried using boot-cljs +test via tenzing and just couldnt get anything working, looks like doo and running on nodejs is still in development/not working

https://github.com/crisptrutski/boot-cljs-test/issues/15

so thought to ask if there is an easy way to just run this via a browser repl?

without needing any other js runtime

@lukemorton: tenzing ships with an old boot-cljs-test version

try 0.2.0-SNAPSHOT

works for me in a newly generated project

that using phantomjs or node?

phantom

for just running tests in a repl I’d suggest trying run-tests just as in clojure, not sure if that will just work though

@gary: sorry but we're full

re: clojurecup

Hint: I don't think Clojurecup's rules (explicitly) forbid bribing judges 😄

hahahaha

@juhoteperi: i have been thinking about the GPG stuff a lot the past week

i think i have a good solution

well potentially

basically this:

the configure-repository callback will be called before accessing the repo

it can do GPG stuff, or whatever

then we're not in the business of configuration, we're in a place where we can program

Yeah looks okay

I wouldn't expose a multimethod directly, maybe instead just provide function to register configure calls and keep them on a atom

why is that?

I just think that it's better to expose a function instead of multimethod

It is easier to change the implementation later if it's a function

but multimethods are functions

oh you mean to define the dispatch

Perhaps multimethod is fine

Or we could hide the multimethod behind a macro, I'm just thinking about the API we want to expose

one thing with multimethod dispatch is that you can then use hierarchies if you want

we'd want to use a separate hierarchy for that

probably useless lol

Could be useful for setting configuration that should be used for deploy and download

But I'm not sure if that would be the best solution for that

(configure-repository
  {:url #""
   :ops #{:deploy :resolve-dependencies}
   :fn (fn [base] (merge base {:username "bar" :password "foo"}))})

How about something like that?

Will probably make sense to allow regexes for urls

i dunno

the multimethod is so simple

are repo url regexes really useful?

I dunno 😄

Maybe not

also seems like maybe bad practice?

We should implement the multimethod version and see if works

like sending creds to a repo that matches the regex

but not the one you expect

Using boot-cljs, I’m not able to get the compiled javascript file to go where I want it to using cljs compiler options. Here’s my task

(deftask build []
  (comp
    (speak)
    (cljs :compiler-options {:output-to "index.ios.js"
                             :optimizations :advanced})))

It ends up in target/main.js

@adamfrey: i think you want to make a index.ios.cljs.edn file

ok, I thought I only needed those for multiple builds

if you don't make one the cljs task makes a default one for you

called main.cljs.edn

so you end up with main.js

that works and creates a file with correct name. But is there a way to have that file end up outside of the target directory the project root?

you can make a task that writes files to any place

using sift? all right'

not using sift

you'd want to make your own task

none of the built-in boot things know anything about the target dir

they only operate on boot-managed temp dirs

oh, you want it to be in a subdirectory?

you can make your index.ios.cljs.edn file as like src/foop/index.ios.cljs.edn

then it will end up in the foop subdir

if that's what you want

right now the file ends up in ~/project-root/target/index.ios.js but I want it in ~/project-root/index.ios.js

you'd need to make a task for that

(deftask copy
  [f from PATH str "source"
   t to PATH str "destination"]
  (with-pre-wrap [fs]
    (io/copy (tmp-file (first (by-path [from] (output-files fs)))) (io/file to))
    fs))

somethings like that

@micha Thanks! Unfortunately for me I didn’t look back at your code to see you edited and added the first call. But I poked around in the repl and figured out what was wrong. It was a boot learning experience for me, so I’m better off anyway

great! 👍

@micha: @alandipert Good luck with the ClojureCup!

@martinklepsch: Oh, you're participating too. Good luck!

Yes! How about you @danielsz?

That sounds great. I'm good, thanks!

I won't have time for the Clojure Cup this year. I'm launching my service (the Clojure rewrite)

Very busy with that (but in a fun way)