Clojurians Log v2

I find that cond-> can help a lot in those cases. But I do find myself putting nils and filtering the result when cond-> gets too verbose

Thanks for the pointer!

(cond-> []
  verbose? (conj :verbose)
  some-opt (conj 1)
  ...)

Right, this is nice, that is exactly what I was looking for! Edit: I stumbled on something similar with a reduce and a sequence of functions, but that was quite complicated, I thought.

On Clojuredocs, the cond->> page has a nice example of the above idiom where you get those test clauses from destructuring a map https://clojuredocs.org/clojure.core/cond-%3E%3E#example-555ce83ee4b01ad59b65f4d2

here's one way to do it, if I understand the question correctly

(ins)user=> (reduce into []
                    [(if nil [:a])
                     (if true [:b])
                     (if false [:c])
                     [:d]])
[:b :d]

cond->> is probably nicer if you know all the conditions at compile time

I don't like about this that all the tests have to return a list.