more or less, yea. on the other hand, parking put, >! ,is for inside of go blocks which will run in a thread pool. since there a limited number of threads, if you block them, then you can prevent other go blocks from running. you don't want to call blocking put, >!! ,inside of a go block

Ah okay thanks that's a little more clear

the version should probably be "3.0.0" rather than "3.0.0alpha13". there is a "3.0.0-alpha13", but "3.0.0" is the latest, https://clojars.org/refactor-nrepl/refactor-nrepl

yep that worked

ty 🙏

I never knew people used linuxbrew…

https://youtu.be/ChUzrcB9L1c there is this series. Clojure script for react Devs.

could work only I do not know react

AS far as I've seen, people don't generally use react directly and instead opt for reagent. https://reagent-project.github.io/

But frontend stuff is definitely not my specialty, I've only ever needed to use the basics of that reagent page to make anything I've wanted.

also not mine. I see that more and more loves back-end stuff. Also tried to learn clojurescript but have not enough xp and knowlegde to make a nice layout

Reagent is probably a good way to get started. If you have little experience in frontend stuff, just start by realising you are your first user. What do you need, what do you want to accomplish and what is the easiest way to do so. You only need a pencil and a piece of paper to solve that. Once you have figured out what it is you need, start by creating the simplest components and slowly build up the UI. I would recommend taking a look at storybook and its philosophy if interested. It may be a bit much, but its component driven methodology is certainly a good way to reduce complexity and build better code/components.

Oke, if I look at the next challenge the components are there but no css or whatever

I think you will ahve to learn html / css seperately. I can't imagine anyone writing a tutorial for clojurescript / reagent / re-frame etc is going to be include learning css

This one not

and it also not given any css to let it see as given in the first image

like here : https://www.learn-clojurescript.com/section-3/lesson-20-capstone-3-contact-book/

there is a reference to bulma's styles at the bottom of the page. I assume that is what it uses for styling

oke, then I can better clone the code then type with the tutorial

and then change things to make a telephone number. Which schould havea type what I think could be personal or a company telephone number

Jacek Schae has a tutorial but I'm not sure if it's free

I only know this one is free : https://www.jacekschae.com/learn-reagent-free

but is a small part of a bigger course which costs some 200 euro and that is a lot of money for a hobby developer

pity that all good courses are paid.

Is this close enough to what you want?

(defmulti download! (fn [file _ _] (:protocol file)))

That is good @U7XR2PZFW 🙂

let me give it a try...

What would you say is most idiomatic? The dispatch function is super easy and unlikely to change, meaning I don't think I need to test it

Or to make even fewer assumptions about the number of arguments:

(defmulti download! (fn [file & _] (:protocol file)))

I often find myself using a dispatch function that has as few assumptions about the arguments as possible. In this case, you only care about the first argument to the function, so I would say the most idiomatic approach is to use a dispatch function that ignores all other arguments (regardless of how many of them there are).

To your original question, I don’t know of a way to pass a different (sub)set of arguments to the dispatch function.

No worries. I think your proposal here makes sense. Hiding the other arguments with & is a clever way of making the dispatch function not care.

Thanks 🙂

Happy to help!

Ahh thx a lot I didn't know about the vararg conversion yet!