This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2017-10-21
Channels
- # aws-lambda (12)
- # beginners (20)
- # boot (1)
- # clara (15)
- # clojure (17)
- # clojure-dev (6)
- # clojure-greece (4)
- # clojure-russia (4)
- # clojure-spec (27)
- # clojure-uk (3)
- # clojurescript (22)
- # cursive (1)
- # data-science (3)
- # datomic (4)
- # fulcro (2)
- # juxt (2)
- # leiningen (2)
- # lumo (19)
- # protorepl (13)
- # re-frame (42)
- # reagent (5)
- # ring-swagger (1)
- # shadow-cljs (89)
- # spacemacs (1)
- # uncomplicate (3)
Ring doesn't need them lower case. They're case insensitive. It converts them to lowercase to match Clojure's normal naming.
As I noted above, it uses a specific case-insensitive comparison when working with headers -- so even if you used Sentence-Case it would all still work. It's just nice and consistent with Clojure naming to have them be lower-case.
Hi! Not sure if this is the right place to ask, but is there a way to fix compojure and/or ring, with the new release of leiningen?
Exception in thread “main” java.lang.RuntimeException: No reader function for tag object, compiling:(/private/var/folders/r_/whjqdcfx3757scdwdmx0_r680000gn/T/form-init6637250780543903319.clj:1:8265) at clojure.lang.Compiler.load(Compiler.java:7386) at clojure.lang.Compiler.loadFile(Compiler.java:7317) at clojure.main$load_script.invokeStatic(main.clj:275) at clojure.main$init_opt.invokeStatic(main.clj:277) at clojure.main$init_opt.invoke(main.clj:277) at clojure.main$initialize.invokeStatic(main.clj:308) at clojure.main$null_opt.invokeStatic(main.clj:342) at clojure.main$null_opt.invoke(main.clj:339) at clojure.main$main.invokeStatic(main.clj:421) at clojure.main$main.doInvoke(main.clj:384) at clojure.lang.RestFn.invoke(RestFn.java:421) at clojure.lang.Var.invoke(Var.java:383) at clojure.lang.AFn.applyToHelper(AFn.java:156) at clojure.lang.Var.applyTo(Var.java:700) at clojure.main.main(main.java:37) Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: No reader function for tag object at clojure.lang.LispReader$CtorReader.readTagged(LispReader.java:1245) at clojure.lang.LispReader$CtorReader.invoke(LispReader.java:1228) at clojure.lang.LispReader$DispatchReader.invoke(LispReader.java:684) at clojure.lang.LispReader.read(LispReader.java:263) at clojure.lang.LispReader.read(LispReader.java:200) at clojure.lang.LispReader.access$200(LispReader.java:40) at clojure.lang.LispReader$MetaReader.invoke(LispReader.java:800) at clojure.lang.LispReader.read(LispReader.java:263) at clojure.lang.LispReader.readDelimitedList(LispReader.java:1200) at clojure.lang.LispReader$MapReader.invoke(LispReader.java:1158) at clojure.lang.LispReader.read(LispReader.java:263) at clojure.lang.LispReader.read(LispReader.java:200) at clojure.lang.LispReader.access$200(LispReader.java:40) at clojure.lang.LispReader$MetaReader.invoke(LispReader.java:792) at clojure.lang.LispReader.read(LispReader.java:263) at clojure.lang.LispReader.readDelimitedList(LispReader.java:1200) at clojure.lang.LispReader$VectorReader.invoke(LispReader.java:1150) at clojure.lang.LispReader.read(LispReader.java:263) at clojure.lang.LispReader.readDelimitedList(LispReader.java:1200) at clojure.lang.LispReader$MapReader.invoke(LispReader.java:1158) at clojure.lang.LispReader.read(LispReader.java:263) at clojure.lang.LispReader.read(LispReader.java:200) at clojure.lang.LispReader.access$200(LispReader.java:40) at clojure.lang.LispReader$MetaReader.invoke(LispReader.java:800) at clojure.lang.LispReader.read(LispReader.java:263) at clojure.lang.LispReader.readDelimitedList(LispReader.java:1200) at clojure.lang.LispReader$MapReader.invoke(LispReader.java:1158) at clojure.lang.LispReader.read(LispReader.java:263) at clojure.lang.LispReader.readDelimitedList(LispReader.java:1200) at clojure.lang.LispReader$MapReader.invoke(LispReader.java:1158) at clojure.lang.LispReader.read(LispReader.java:263) at clojure.lang.LispReader.read(LispReader.java:200) at clojure.lang.LispReader.access$200(LispReader.java:40) at clojure.lang.LispReader$MetaReader.invoke(LispReader.java:792) at clojure.lang.LispReader.read(LispReader.java:263) at clojure.lang.LispReader.readDelimitedList(LispReader.java:1200) at clojure.lang.LispReader$ListReader.invoke(LispReader.java:1049) at clojure.lang.LispReader.read(LispReader.java:263) at clojure.lang.LispReader.readDelimitedList(LispReader.java:1200) at clojure.lang.LispReader$ListReader.invoke(LispReader.java:1049) at clojure.lang.LispReader.read(LispReader.java:263) at clojure.lang.LispReader.readDelimitedList(LispReader.java:1200) at clojure.lang.LispReader$ListReader.invoke(LispReader.java:1049) at clojure.lang.LispReader.read(LispReader.java:263) at clojure.lang.LispReader.read(LispReader.java:196) at clojure.lang.Compiler.load(Compiler.java:7374) ... 14 more Subprocess failed
RE: Naming conventions - HOF
I have a HOF that creates an event-handler
- what is the more common naming convention in clojurescript
set-keyup-handler
or
create-keyup-handler
does it just create a function, or does it also register a handler to be called?
sorry, what do you mean by "register a handler to be called"?
my choice would be either create-keyup-handler-function
or register-keyup-handler
@tkjone does it tell the browser to call the function on keyup, or does it just return the function to call?
It would be this:
;; code would look like this
(.addEventListener js/window "keyup" (create-keyup-handler "secret"))
;; which would be the equivalent, if I just wrote the function in place, of this because
;; create-keyup-handler is going to return keyup-handler
(.addEventListener js/window "keyup" keyup-handler)
So I believe it would just return the function to call - sorry - the phrasing threw me off a littleyeah - I wouldn't name it set-keyup-handler
if it's not the thing that calls addEventListener
so create-keyup-handler
makes sense
Thanks!