This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2016-08-23
Channels
- # admin-announcements (1)
- # alda (1)
- # bangalore-clj (5)
- # beginners (17)
- # boot (392)
- # capetown (4)
- # cider (16)
- # cljs-dev (24)
- # cljsrn (33)
- # clojure (106)
- # clojure-berlin (1)
- # clojure-nl (1)
- # clojure-russia (168)
- # clojure-spec (85)
- # clojure-uk (137)
- # clojurescript (83)
- # clojutre (4)
- # component (10)
- # cursive (6)
- # datavis (9)
- # datomic (11)
- # defnpodcast (15)
- # dirac (4)
- # docker (1)
- # ethereum (1)
- # hoplon (27)
- # jobs (5)
- # jobs-rus (1)
- # lein-figwheel (2)
- # luminus (5)
- # off-topic (5)
- # om (13)
- # onyx (60)
- # parinfer (2)
- # planck (12)
- # proton (2)
- # re-frame (45)
- # rethinkdb (5)
- # ring-swagger (9)
- # spacemacs (9)
- # specter (49)
- # test-check (1)
- # untangled (104)
- # yada (10)
Do I lose any functionalities by using remote nrepl isntead of a local?
@oahner I'm noticing some lack of intelligence by the cursive IDE
but I don't know if it's because I'm outside the src folder
the major issue I always run into is when the tooling looks at the classpath to find a file and then the editor tries to load the file locally
which obviously never works when my client is windows and the repl is running on a linux server
for that reason, I tend to develop with remote services (pgsql, redis, etc..) and a local repl
hm, I'm working on a windows dev machine and the repl is remote but in the same machine, the problem is that he is suggesting that I use the manifold.deferred library instead of datomic.api that is already inside my require block
he's requiring the wrong d 👽
Hi. The hash
function is eager on collections, right? I.e. if I have two lazy seqs that would evaluate to the same eager seq I can count on them having the same hash?
whoops, sorry I hit the keyboard to early. Actually to my understanding if two sequences equal they must have the same hash:
user> (hash (range 0 5))
-160844199
user> (hash [0 1 2 3 4])
-160844199
user> (hash (reverse [4 3 2 1 0]))
-160844199
yeah, emprically it seemed that way to me too, just not sure if I could count on it
Hash includes hash of all elements, so must force lazy seqs