This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2015-08-12
Channels
- # admin-announcements (3)
- # announcements (1)
- # beginners (9)
- # boot (85)
- # bristol-clojurians (4)
- # cider (12)
- # cljs-dev (3)
- # clojure (91)
- # clojure-berlin (7)
- # clojure-dev (16)
- # clojure-italy (21)
- # clojure-russia (67)
- # clojure-spain (3)
- # clojure-uk (6)
- # clojurescript (139)
- # core-async (41)
- # cursive (7)
- # datomic (61)
- # editors (56)
- # events (16)
- # hoplon (11)
- # jobs (4)
- # ldnclj (14)
- # liberator (7)
- # off-topic (13)
- # om (5)
- # re-frame (22)
- # ring-swagger (27)
I just read this: https://www.reddit.com/r/Clojure/comments/3gkesa/sicp_in_clojure/cu0fzai and there someone says that there is no tail recursion in clojure. AFAIK we have loop recur which "simulates" tail recursion and translates it to a while / for loop under the hood, is that right
i’ve come to believe that if they have anything valuable to say, as form of a rebuttal, they should write a blog post about it.
takes much more effort to eloquently explain why the other post was wrong, than to jump in and shout something short and clever
.
roberto: Agreed, Still, what I meant are other comments that provide further resources to links, docs, whatever. And, tbh, sometimes I read the comments for the useless flamewars 😄
my favorite example of a flamewar
brilliantly plastered in a blog post. http://blog.getify.com/not-all-semicolons