Clojurians Log v2

This is just tools deps, not special to bb

if you have only one custom class, compiling it with the lowest bytecode version setting and just checking in the .class file into source control is worth preventing the prep-lib dance, imo

like we did here: https://github.com/nextjournal/markdown/tree/main/src/nextjournal/markdown/impl/types

e.g.:

javac --release 8 MyClass.java

i mean my GH Action that calls bb lazytest raises this, which is surprising to me. i thought bb couldn't handle .class files: https://github.com/NoahTheDuke/lazytest/actions/runs/15940901952/job/44968809963#step:9:1

bb doesn't care about .class files, but if you specify in your library that it needs prepping, then tools.deps will require this

https://github.com/NoahTheDuke/lazytest/blob/1f3df317b36e7256513d955044be802e5d84bda3/deps.edn#L9

you can probably bypass this step by manually prepping the lib before you call bb

bb clojure -X:deps prep

I don't know if it preps a local project though

it's silly to me that you have to prep deps with bb given it doesn't use the resulting class files lol

thanks, i got it working

I don't make tools.deps's rules

how did you get it working? I tried local prepping but I don't think the clojure CLI supports it

if tools.deps supports a toggle that avoids prepping, I'd happily use it

if you release a mvn/version we also don't have this problem with bb, so there's two ways to solve it currently

> I tried local prepping but I don't think the clojure CLI supports it clojure -X:deps prep :current true maybe?

https://github.com/babashka/babashka/pull/1836

hell yeah!

Added a little test for it too: https://github.com/babashka/babashka/commit/fc151ce361317636173917950fb9f7cb3f11e7cb Sometimes strange things happen in a native image with reflection (e.g. when some call returns some private class) so I usually add a smoke test like this

ah thanks, i should have written one

no worries

In 10 minutes or so you could use the dev build to run lazytest's tests in bb in CI I guess. I could also add them to bb's CI but the problem is, I'm using clojure.test, lol

amazing!

you're still going to the PR with the missing class, right?

(no hurry)

yes