Fork me on GitHub
Slack Archive

This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.

2022-03-11

Channels

#babashka
<
2022-03-11
>
jgdavey01:03:55

@borkdude Have you ever tried the transit+msgpack format (I know that transit json works) in babashka? Getting reflection errors from MsgPack when trying to initialize

borkdude08:03:05

The MessagePack library isn't included in bb, can you tell more about your use case for it?

jgdavey14:03:47

We store some data using transit+msgpack and gzip on s3, and I was looking for a way to “unpack” it without having a JVM repl going.

🙌 1
borkdude14:03:06

Perhaps we could add messagepack support to jet

Byron Clark17:08:44

Sorry to bring an old thread back to life, but it looks like cq only supports transit+msgpack when using the JVM release, not the one built with babashka. Same reflection errors as when trying to use transit with msgpack directly from babashka.

Byron Clark17:08:31

My usecase is to review wire protocol messages for datomic when using http.

borkdude18:08:04

I see. I think I'd like to support this in #jet first. Feel free to create an issue there on Github

Byron Clark20:08:30

jet would be perfect. I’ll create an issue there. Thanks!

markw22:08:44

@U0394DH0S3W I wasn't aware transit+msgpack doesn't work for cq via GraalVM Could you open an issue there as well and I'll investigate 🙂 (PS: cq is still not built with bb but directly with Graal because I keep not getting around to doing that)

✅ 1
borkdude10:03:13

I'm considering to add clojure.data.priority-map to babashka which will also make loom compatible with bb: https://github.com/aysylu/loom

👍 1