This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2020-09-21
Channels
- # announcements (3)
- # architecture (5)
- # babashka (19)
- # beginners (145)
- # calva (1)
- # chlorine-clover (18)
- # cider (10)
- # clj-kondo (5)
- # cljsrn (3)
- # clojure (56)
- # clojure-berlin (19)
- # clojure-czech (2)
- # clojure-europe (32)
- # clojure-finland (2)
- # clojure-nl (3)
- # clojure-portugal (2)
- # clojure-spec (8)
- # clojure-uk (48)
- # clojurescript (48)
- # conjure (50)
- # cryogen (1)
- # cursive (28)
- # datomic (54)
- # depstar (12)
- # emacs (1)
- # events (8)
- # figwheel-main (6)
- # fulcro (4)
- # helix (4)
- # java (2)
- # jobs (2)
- # leiningen (1)
- # off-topic (29)
- # parinfer (4)
- # pathom (6)
- # portkey (3)
- # reagent (1)
- # remote-jobs (3)
- # reveal (16)
- # shadow-cljs (42)
- # sql (20)
- # tools-deps (11)
- # vim (4)
- # vrac (2)
@borkdude: FYI I created this issue on rolling bb support upstream into integrant: https://github.com/weavejester/integrant/issues/86
@borkdude: Some of the integrant tests use clojure.core/find-var
and it looks like that’s not included in bb/sci. Is that supportable?
----- Error --------------------------------------------------------------------
Type: clojure.lang.ExceptionInfo
Message: Could not resolve symbol: find-var
Location: /Users/rick/repos/3rdparty/integrant/test/integrant/core_test.cljc:101:50
Phase: analysis
----- Context ------------------------------------------------------------------
97: (is (= (ig/read-string "{:foo/a #ig/ref :foo/b, :foo/b 1}")
98: {:foo/a (ig/ref :foo/b), :foo/b 1}))
99: (is (= (ig/read-string "{:foo/a #ig/refset :foo/b, :foo/b 1}")
100: {:foo/a (ig/refset :foo/b), :foo/b 1}))
101: (is (= (ig/read-string {:readers {'test/var find-var}}
^--- Could not resolve symbol: find-var
102: "{:foo/a #test/var clojure.core/+}")
103: {:foo/a #'+}))))
104:
105: #?(:clj
106: (defn- remove-lib [lib]
Yeah I think so
of course :thumbsup:
looks like you already support find
(which find-var
uses)
If you have questions/suggestions about sci implementation related things, #sci is also a good channel for that
:thumbsup: Great thanks… I’ll maybe take a look at it later if I have enough energy this evening or later in the week, but for now I need to do some real work…
Issue opened here: https://github.com/borkdude/sci/issues/420
ok no rush from my part btw… I don’t even have a use for bb yet alone integrant+bb 🙂 just figured I’d have a play with it.
Agreed… there’s a lot of things I can picture myself using sci/bb for; just thought I’d start dipping my toes into the ecosystem a little first. Thanks again for everything! Exciting times!