based on https://gist.github.com/ericnormand/6bb4562c4bc578ef223182e3bb1e72c5

it’s a little messy, just proving the concept

Hey, cool. There's also one here by lambdaisland: https://github.com/lambdaisland/open-source/blob/master/bin/bb

If you have published your final preamble somewhere, we can link it in https://github.com/borkdude/babashka/blob/master/doc/libraries.md

Thanks. I now updated it to: > - No deftype, definterface and unboxed math. 😛

lol

oops

thanks!

I couldn’t find a mention of that script sci-without-checks

@U0FT7SRLP you should run script/compile. this will produce a sci binary which you can then run with multitime

currently graalvm 20.1.0 java11 is used

tmp/... is just a binary I copied to a tmp dir for testing

so I could compare various versions

ah yeah makes sense

Ok still need to update java 11 and I still need to fix my Graal setup since I moved to mac Catalina 🙈 So I need some more time

you don't need to install java11, just download a graalvm, unzip it to your downloads dir and then

export GRAALVM_HOME=/Users/borkdude/Downloads/graalvm-ce-java11-20.1.0/Contents/Home

In case you ever upgrade to Catalina, note that you have to run sudo xattr -r -d com.apple.quarantine $HOME/bin/graalvm-ce-java11-20.1.0 (on the root not on the nested Contents/home). From this comment https://github.com/oracle/graal/issues/1724#issuecomment-540160024

thanks

macOS is becoming more and more hostile towards unsigned binaries

I guess it’s good eventually, but it’s painful if you are upgrading unexpectedly. I didn’t find this link at first and destroyed my old Graalvm setup (it asks to move binaries and I clicked “yes” a couple of times)

ok executed the tests for the different commits. I don’t really see a pattern https://github.com/borkdude/sci/pull/349#issuecomment-642624211

maybe try with a higher number than 10

ok thanks, trying 3 x 100 now. Will report back in 15 minutes 🙂

I might misinterpret the results, but i don’t feel there is a real difference between the different commits

ok, then it might be a co-incidence what I saw on my local machine

Very cool to see an example of running carve on an uberscript. I was wondering how to do that. Thanks!

Maybe we could also have a carve pod 😉

Glad the carve example is helpful and thanks again to borkdude for the awesome tooling 🙂

is carve able to run in babashka as a lib? if not, then definitely a carve pod would be cool

it's not. however, carve is built using two parts: clj-kondo for analysis and rewrite-clj for removing things from code. Nowadays we have the ingredients needed as pods: - clj-kondo can run as a pod. - https://github.com/babashka/pod-babashka-parcera can be used to remove things from code

so theoretically, one can build a script which does a similar thing to carve using these two pods

👍