Fork me on GitHub
#babashka
<
2020-02-07
>
borkdude11:02:03

if someone has some time to spare. the GraalVM devs are working towards finalizing GraalVM 20. I was asked to do some testing see issue: https://github.com/borkdude/babashka/issues/258 if someone wants to help, go ahead!

holyjak14:02:10

A crazy question, will it (ever) be possible to run https://github.com/cognitect-labs/aws-api under bb? (Or perhaps I need to wait until @jeroenvandijk is done porting it to cljs? :))

borkdude14:02:26

scroll a little bit back, @stijn also asked this. maybe he has ideas on it

borkdude14:02:20

maybe a sci based project (like babashka, bootleg, etc) can be made custom tailored around this library if it doesn't work with bb as is

borkdude14:02:41

@holyjak if you're using bb at a company, might be nice to mention it here: https://github.com/borkdude/babashka/issues/254

holyjak15:02:29

Not yet :(

borkdude15:02:43

ok, could always try 😃

jeroenvandijk15:02:32

@holyjak I have ported the assume-role api request map generation call to cljs. I think it's the hardest part. It includes the signing of the authorization headers. There is lots more though to be complete, but I think it should be possible to slowly get there. Running it under Babashka would require a bit more work I guess, unless all the cryptographic classes are available

holyjak17:02:36

Well if it is cljs then we could just run it with Planck / Lumo, bb doesn't add anything there...

borkdude15:02:06

@jeroenvandijk what about forking bb and adding it as a built-in library?

holyjak17:02:15

How to add a built-in library?

borkdude17:02:12

@holyjak the same way all other built-in libraries are added to babashka

borkdude17:02:26

check babashka.main and look for cheshire.core for example

borkdude15:02:22

then it could be bb-aws-api

jeroenvandijk15:02:30

Yeah would work too I guess

jeroenvandijk15:02:20

@holyjak Do you need the convenience of the library or do you just need to do some AWS call in a specific context? What I have is not convenient yet. Probably easier to shell out to the Python cli client

holyjak17:02:47

I need to script some aws interactions and would prefer clj(s) over python / JS out of principle :)

jeroenvandijk09:02:11

I'll share what I have soon