This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2020-08-14
Channels
- # atom-editor (5)
- # babashka (6)
- # beginners (29)
- # calva (16)
- # cider (1)
- # clj-kondo (20)
- # cljs-dev (44)
- # clojure (29)
- # clojure-europe (19)
- # clojure-nl (8)
- # clojure-norway (7)
- # clojure-spec (2)
- # clojure-sweden (1)
- # clojure-uk (56)
- # clojurescript (32)
- # code-reviews (30)
- # conjure (24)
- # cursive (49)
- # datomic (4)
- # fulcro (31)
- # helix (3)
- # instaparse (4)
- # kaocha (100)
- # lambdaisland (2)
- # mid-cities-meetup (1)
- # monads (1)
- # off-topic (42)
- # pathom (13)
- # pedestal (6)
- # portal (5)
- # re-frame (6)
- # reagent (9)
- # reitit (11)
- # remote-jobs (1)
- # rewrite-clj (11)
- # shadow-cljs (44)
- # sql (22)
- # tools-deps (13)
- # uncomplicate (1)
- # xtdb (15)
Random thoughts about editors: https://twitter.com/mauricio_szabo/status/1294388380680310788
Yeah, that resonates with me. After all, I switched from Emacs (after two decades) to Atom because I wanted a modern, customizable editor -- whereas Emacs isn't modern and VS Code isn't customizable. You're right that a lot of people who pick a "modern editor" don't seem to want the level of customization that Atom offers (and I keep seeing people on Reddit et al saying "Isn't Atom dead?").
Yep, even with new updates people ask if "atom is dead" because no particular "new feature" is being developed - just bugfixes and version bumps of some packages. I really don't know what'll happen to Atom in the future, but I really don't want to see VSCode replacing it 😞
I could probably live with VS Code if it allowed more customization 🙂
i've been pleasantly surprised to find that atom is working better now for me than when i first started using it 🙂 i've found vscode is snappy and slick, but after having made some extensions, i distinctly get the feeling that if you want to do anything that isn't in ms' plans you may very likely have a very difficult time. this is one area where i find emacs and atom to be much better (though i've found the latter to be a lot harder to work with when investigating "difficulties").