Clojurians Log v2

So I'm curious, is this considered a bug?

(let [eg-db-uri "asami:"
      conn (asami/connect eg-db-uri)
      _ @(asami/transact conn {:tx-data [{:coord [0 0]}]})
      db (asami/db conn)]
  (asami/q
    '[:find [?e ...]
      :where
      [?e :coord [0 0]]]
    db))

#_=> ()

(let [eg-db-uri "asami:"
      conn (asami/connect eg-db-uri)
      db (asami/db conn)
      new-node (zuko.node/new-node (asami/graph db))
      _ @(asami/transact conn {:tx-triples [[new-node :coord [0 0]]]})
      db (asami/db conn)]
  (asami/q
    '[:find [?e ...]
      :where
      [?e :coord [0 0]]]
    db))

#_=> (:a/node-65763)

No, it's not considered a bug. The first case is (currently) explicitly supposed to decompose the array into triples, and therefore the query is guaranteed to return nothing. The only time an array is not decomposed is if the property is :db/ident or :id

Hey @quoll, hope you're feeling better! Ok, so in which case I should probably work with triples explicitly then so I can query for stored structures.

Just to let people know… I had a private discussion with @folcon. Didn’t want people to think that I’m ignoring the channel 🙂