Clojurians Log v2

Running a simple query benchmark (thousands of entities) I found durable performs order of magnitude faster than in-memory. Should I be surprised about this? entity benchmark for a deep tree showed durable to be about 4 times slower, which is what I expected.

I wonder of the in-memory was eager and the one from durable was lazy?

I don't know how I could find out, sorry 😄

The other thing to check is that the data returned from durable is correct!!! 🙂

But just doing type on the data that comes back will often tell you if it's a LazySeq

Alternatively, try timing the process where the final step is (into []). That usually materializes the data

hey I remember somewhere to have read a comparison between Asami and Datascript. Do you guys remember where that could have been?

No, though I saw Arne Brasseur did a series of small scale tests

Well, actually, https://www.reddit.com/r/Clojure/comments/ntuf0c/clojure_datalog_databases/h1w0vwa/?utm_source=pocket_mylist of @quoll's 🙂

I believe https://github.com/lambdaisland/datalog-benchmarks/blob/main/src/datalog_benchmarks/scratch.clj referred to?