This is SO COOL! Thanks for working on this!

A comment I saw a while back on LtU comes to mind: > Language stacks inevitably have abstraction leaks. The lower level language leaks into the higher level one, whether by explicit embedding or various design assumptions. > > ...An intriguing alternative is to invert the stack. > > Start with a conventionally high-level language that has many nice properties except performance - composition, concurrency, reflection, automatic memory management, natural numbers with bignum arithmetic, caching, optimizing, etc. > > ...Such a language stack supports appropriate levels of abstraction/performance, but upon a more robust foundation. http://lambda-the-ultimate.org/node/5590#comment-96320 it really seems like your work here demonstrates the viability of Clojure and malli as a sufficiently expressive combination to fill this particular niche. very cool stuff.

@UFTRLDZEW Indeed, I feel right at home with those posts. And a bit later: "in order to invert the language stack, you need to separate the conceptual stack from the implementation stack, because with the latter we obviously have to have the low-level stuff at the bottom" This is why I got a bit obsessed with WASM. It is an abstract language for an abstract machine, yet its execution (runtimes) is low-level. It is a unique opportunity for going as low as possible while caring for a single and unique target. Because we have that single target, it makes sense to build high-level tooling, we are building on a single foundation. Hopefully, that makes sense!

You are on an incredible roll, @UCFG3SDFV! It almost looks like you have been borkdude-ified :-) Great work!

@U0522TWDA Being borkdude-ified, genuinely an honour 😄 Yes, all this was stuff that was laying in the dark, I took some time to clean those projects and make public. Almost done, but not yet!

Congrats on the release! Linked the lib from malli README. Looking forward on the future of &

FYI Cljdoc import has failed, says https://cljdoc.org/d/fierycod/holy-lambda/0.1.2/doc/1-01-installation

Thanks @U0522TWDA I’m aware, but still there is nothing useful in docs :(. @U017Y2J9F0W will probably change the docs state by adding “getting started” guide.