This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2020-10-04
Channels
- # announcements (27)
- # babashka (1)
- # beginners (70)
- # calva (3)
- # cljfx (4)
- # clojure (37)
- # clojure-australia (1)
- # clojure-europe (1)
- # clojure-germany (6)
- # clojurescript (5)
- # conjure (4)
- # cursive (2)
- # data-science (3)
- # datomic (20)
- # events (1)
- # fulcro (9)
- # graalvm (7)
- # jobs-discuss (3)
- # joker (1)
- # malli (2)
- # pathom (2)
- # re-frame (8)
- # reitit (1)
- # shadow-cljs (44)
- # sql (16)
- # xtdb (8)
Neanderthal 0.38.0 released, with CUDA 11 support! Vectors, matrices, and linear lagebra in Clojure with incredible speed on CPU, Nvidia GPU, and AMD GPUs! http://neanderthal.uncomplicate.org http://github.com/uncomplicate/neanderthalhttps://t.co/0CBopKQUon?amp=1 http://aiprobook.com
parcera v0.11.4
is out. This release includes support for octal literals and two bug fixes for symbols and eval. Hope you like it 🙂. Thanks to @sogaiu for his support testing all the different scenarios.
https://github.com/carocad/parcera
Scicloj's interview with Anthony Khong about Geni is now available on YouTube. Geni, written by Anthony, is a REPL-friendly Clojure wrappper for Apache Spark. Tune in to learn about how Anthony Khong got into data science, what limits Spark Notebooks, and how the situation changes with Clojure. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3R2FJQdtLf8
I cannot save it for later in YouTube because it is marked Made for Kids https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/9632097?nohelpkit=1&hl=en-GB
@U3X7174KS This sort of thing belongs in #news-and-articles and not in #announcements which is intended for project/library release announcements (per the topic of the channel).
@U04V70XH6 Maybe mention this policy in the topic then? To me this channel is a perfect place for this type of announcement (I didn't know about the other channel until now) but I'm fine with the other place if it's easy to find.
@U06BE1L6T read this channel's description -- it really is pretty clear.
I know (after I read it) but it's not clear where the other things should go. Also the channel name is quite generic
The description can't be expanded -- Slack has a limit there. I've updated the topic to point to other channels.
Most people read the topic, see it's only for projects and libraries, and ask in #slack-help or #community-development about where they should post non-project/lib announcments.
BTW, channel topics are also limited in length and, unfortunately, any member can change the topic so we're always at the mercy of members changing the topic -- it's not something Admins can control...
@U06BE1L6T Everyone is auto-joined to #events and #news-and-articles so I'm surprised you didn't know about them.
(also to #slack-help #beginners #clojure #off-topic -- from that initial set of seven channels, folks ought to be able to figure out how to get around here)
Thanks, that helps. I wasn't there for some reason - maybe the "auto join" for this channel was only configured after I joined clojurians? (I think more than 3 years ago)
Entirely possible -- but if you've been around that long, I'm genuinely surprised you haven't run across those channels by now... 🙂
@U04V70XH6 Thanks, for letting me know, I'll use #news-and-articles in the future.
@U0522TWDA Thanks for the feedback! I can reproduce the problem, and I'll look into it.
I made scripts on the OpenSUSE Build Service to make clj-kondo available to install https://software.opensuse.org//download.html?project=home%3Azilti%3Aclojure&package=clj-kondo, as well as an AppImage. The instructions have been merged into the clj-kondo repository. No more manual updates! https://github.com/borkdude/clj-kondo/blob/master/doc/install.md
New version of mate-clj
is now available on clojars! 🚀
https://github.com/AppsFlyer/mate-clj
Is there a difference from tools.trace ? https://github.com/clojure/tools.trace
i would say its a bit different, the aim of mate-clj is to print to repl the steps of execution of the macro/fn and to give the developer more understanding about each step and how it got to the final result.
but that is exactly what tools.trace is trying to do
user=> (use 'clojure.tools.trace)
nil
user=> (trace-vars + reduce)
nil
user=> (reduce + [1 3 5 7 9])
TRACE t442: (clojure.core/reduce #object[clojure.tools.trace$trace_var_STAR_$fn__319$tracing_wrapper__320 0x71e5f61d "clojure.tools.trace$trace_var_STAR_$fn__319$tracing_wrapper__320@71e5f61d"] [1 3 5 7 9])
TRACE t443: | (clojure.core/+ 1 3)
TRACE t443: | => 4
TRACE t444: | (clojure.core/+ 4 5)
TRACE t444: | => 9
TRACE t445: | (clojure.core/+ 9 7)
TRACE t445: | => 16
TRACE t446: | (clojure.core/+ 16 9)
TRACE t446: | => 25
TRACE t442: => 25
25
but instead of having separate implementation for core functions it is instrumenting resolvable vars leaving implementation intact
the thing is that I wanted to use a different method not wrapping all the fn so for example if i want to debug a specific execution of reduce and not all the executions in a code block if i have it more then one, also we are working working now on having the ability to set a kind of a level to it so you can control when it will be printed to the repl and when not depends on your needs.