announcements 2020-09-22

Alex Miller (Clojure team)02:09:47

clj 1.10.1.693 (prerelease) is now available: • Classpath ordering changes. Classpath will always now be ordered extra-paths, paths, then libs. Libs are ordered by tree depth, then alpha. These changes both revert some ordering changes in the last stable release and go further in defining a reproducible classpath order. • clj -Stree re-enabled for now while we decide on best way to convey classpath-changing options to -Stree and -Spom • Windows scripts updated to latest • This prerelease version should be considered a release candidate for the next stable version! If you try it and have feedback, please leave it in #tools-deps

🙏 30

bruno.bonacci13:09:57

Hi all, i’ve just released https://github.com/BrunoBonacci/mulog v0.5.0 with the following changes/fixes • new Prometheus publisher (thanks @brandon746) • Now with 10+ publishers • fixes to namespace tracking (thanks @ddouglass) • Zipkin publisher support for external trace ids • Updated dependencies. Online doc on cljdoc: https://cljdoc.org/d/com.brunobonacci/mulog/0.5.0/doc/readme

🎉 33

athomasoriginal13:09:35

Nice! I’ve been working on a new CLJ/S project and have configured my logging, but this has me curious. Do you see this used in combination with something like clojure.tools.logging or as a replacement? The “Motivation” section of your docs has me thinking they work together. Apologies if this is not a great place to start this convo. Let me know if there is a better place. Thanks again, the library looks great!

bruno.bonacci13:09:22

Hi, in https://cljdoc.org/d/com.brunobonacci/mulog/0.5.0/doc/f-a-q-#q-can-i-use-%CE%BClog-as-the-sole-logging-library-and-send-my-traditional-logging-to-it I discuss my point of view on this.

👍 3

bruno.bonacci13:09:40

TL;DR> Although possible, there are even supporting libraries, is something that in the general case I wouldn’t recommend. But every case is different so you are free to try and see how does it work for you.

athomasoriginal14:09:07

Great. I can see this as a nice way to instrument the code with metrics and not be bound to a single provider library like iapetos - (Not a knock against this library - it works well)

just.sultanov17:09:57

A simple response unifier v0.1.0 has been released. The next generation of clj-unifier. Any feedback welcome. https://github.com/anywhere-ninja/unifier

👍 12

eggsyntax22:09:45

For what it's worth, I don't really know what a response unifier is or why I would want one, and I didn't really feel clearer on it after looking at the readme 🤷

just.sultanov06:09:47

@U077BEWNQ thank you for the feedback. I added rationale to the readme

👍 9

sogaiu06:09:15

i feel more informed by this addition -- ty!

eggsyntax11:09:50

Thanks!

2020-09-22

Channels