Clojurians Log v2

Do you have a link to the article?

no, it came up during a class I'm following online now

The Times article is paywalled, but I found this: https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2026/jun/03/sydney-academic-used-ai-opinion-piece-urging-students-to-avoid-using-it-ntwnfb

Also this: https://www.smh.com.au/national/uni-academic-admits-she-used-ai-to-write-opinion-piece-in-defence-of-ai-20260602-p6038j.html

Crux of the debate: > But Ellis denied that her piece was written “by” AI. “It was written with AI, and there’s a really big difference there,” she said.

so the headline is correct "using" and "involved" :)

Technically, yes, but "using" and "involved" feel like a weasel words. Did she say "don't use AI" at all? That isn't my impression. Nonetheless, I think the situation illustrates that AI disclosures are mattering more and more.

I haven't looked at the article, I posted this more or less as a note to self to look at this later, the class is still going

OK, class done. This headline was used as an example to illustrate hypocrisy, but maybe it wasn't a good example. Let me read your links

Yeah, I can see how this gets blurry :)