This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2018-11-22
Channels
- # 100-days-of-code (1)
- # adventofcode (21)
- # announcements (2)
- # beginners (44)
- # calva (1)
- # cider (2)
- # cljdoc (16)
- # cljs-dev (70)
- # cljsrn (29)
- # clojure (66)
- # clojure-austria (1)
- # clojure-europe (4)
- # clojure-finland (1)
- # clojure-hamburg (1)
- # clojure-italy (24)
- # clojure-nl (3)
- # clojure-uk (127)
- # clojurescript (30)
- # core-typed (3)
- # cursive (34)
- # data-science (2)
- # datomic (16)
- # duct (17)
- # editors (1)
- # emacs (4)
- # figwheel-main (4)
- # fulcro (40)
- # hoplon (2)
- # instaparse (5)
- # kaocha (4)
- # leiningen (1)
- # luminus (4)
- # nrepl (46)
- # off-topic (5)
- # onyx (2)
- # other-languages (55)
- # parinfer (3)
- # protorepl (4)
- # re-frame (33)
- # reagent (6)
- # reitit (13)
- # ring-swagger (5)
- # shadow-cljs (26)
- # spacemacs (4)
- # sql (8)
- # testing (27)
- # tools-deps (21)
- # yada (1)
I’m thinking of collection some test Clojure programs to run with speculative (a collection of specs for core functions). I made a small start here: https://github.com/borkdude/advent-of-spec
Code will be anonymized, so you don’t have to fear your solution will be compared with others 😉.
That's fine by me, but are we talking about this year's AOC or last year's?
any year. I’ll try to include as many as I can, time permitting. But it’s most fun to include this year in “real time” of course
The purpose is mostly to check our specs or to encounter usage we didn’t think of before.
How about running this year’s codeofadvent on Zulip? I created a stream there at https://clojurians.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/152583-adventofcode Apart from having history, and syntax highlighting it would give us an easier way to discuss exercises in a spoiler-free way.
Interestingly I get different answers for day 2017 day 2 for both @mfikes and @athos than my solution, while the Advent of Code page says my answer is correct
Right, since the data varied per user, sometimes you get away with a non-general solution :(